<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republican working for Keith Ellison?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/republican-working-for-keith-ellison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/republican-working-for-keith-ellison/</link>
	<description>A tolerated heretic in the Minnesota DFL Party</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:13:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dexter</title>
		<link>http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/republican-working-for-keith-ellison/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-647</guid>
		<description>Chad the Elder, you&#039;re spot on. It&#039;s not defeatist but realistic for a conservative to see that BDW has raised almost nothing and is already in debt and has no aggressive campaign going on. You don&#039;t beat an incumbent that way. It&#039;s called putting up a token candidate.

Ellison is going to win by 2-1. The other MN Dem members of Congress also have token to no opposition except Walz. The 3rd, 1st and 6th are probably the GOP priorities in that order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad the Elder, you&#8217;re spot on. It&#8217;s not defeatist but realistic for a conservative to see that BDW has raised almost nothing and is already in debt and has no aggressive campaign going on. You don&#8217;t beat an incumbent that way. It&#8217;s called putting up a token candidate.</p>
<p>Ellison is going to win by 2-1. The other MN Dem members of Congress also have token to no opposition except Walz. The 3rd, 1st and 6th are probably the GOP priorities in that order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nachman</title>
		<link>http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/republican-working-for-keith-ellison/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Nachman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 03:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-646</guid>
		<description>You have the mic on a major local radio station. Instead of sounding defeatist, you should have examined the positions and tactics of your party&#039;s candidate and then made a comparison with Keith Ellison. That would have been a more constructive use of airtime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have the mic on a major local radio station. Instead of sounding defeatist, you should have examined the positions and tactics of your party&#8217;s candidate and then made a comparison with Keith Ellison. That would have been a more constructive use of airtime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chad the elder</title>
		<link>http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/2008/06/01/republican-working-for-keith-ellison/#comment-645</link>
		<dc:creator>chad the elder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loyalopposition.wordpress.com/?p=166#comment-645</guid>
		<description>Chad the Elder is a realist who has lived in the Fifth District long enough to understand the facts on the ground. It&#039;s silly and counter-productive to pretend otherwise. It&#039;s also not very conservative to persist in believing in a particular outcome when all available evidence suggests an opposite result. 

But if you want, I can play make-believe too. 

&quot;John McCain is going to win in a historic landslide.&quot; 

&quot;The Republicans are going to retake control of the House and the Senate.&quot; 

&quot;In Minnesota the GOP is going to retake the House.&quot; 

&quot;The Vikings are going to win the Super Bowl.&quot; 

Feel better now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad the Elder is a realist who has lived in the Fifth District long enough to understand the facts on the ground. It&#8217;s silly and counter-productive to pretend otherwise. It&#8217;s also not very conservative to persist in believing in a particular outcome when all available evidence suggests an opposite result. </p>
<p>But if you want, I can play make-believe too. </p>
<p>&#8220;John McCain is going to win in a historic landslide.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;The Republicans are going to retake control of the House and the Senate.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;In Minnesota the GOP is going to retake the House.&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8220;The Vikings are going to win the Super Bowl.&#8221; </p>
<p>Feel better now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
